This essay critiques historical development in moral teaching on slavery and sex, suggesting distinct ethical implications.
This essay refutes the claim that the Catholic Church’s historical development regarding slavery provides a legitimating precedent for revising its traditional sexual ethics. Drawing on the loci theologici of Melchor Cano and Joseph Ratzinger, the author highlights a fundamental disanalogy: While biblical and patristic teaching on slavery reflects an "ameliorative" trajectory sensitive to social context, its prohibition of same-sex acts is "univocal" and rooted in a context-transcendent anthropology. Ultimately, the shift toward abolition is presented as a modification of the ius gentium enabled by the rise of modern alternatives like centralized incarceration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aaron Pidel (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: