PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Health Expectations0 citationsOpen Access

A Scoping Review of Active Service User Involvement in Undergraduate Allied Health Professions Education

View Full Paper
CSChloe ShandJLJean Daly LynnKPKaty Pedlow

Key Points

  • This review aims to systematically explore the types and measurement of service user involvement in undergraduate allied health education.
  • Conducted a comprehensive search across five databases and grey literature
  • Applied PRISMA‐ScR for review framework
  • Utilized Towle's taxonomy and Kirkpatrick evaluation model for result analysis
  • Identified 25 studies, primarily focusing on occupational therapy and physiotherapy students
  • Most involvement was reported in teaching delivery rather than curriculum design
  • Limited engagement observed at higher levels of partnership in educational processes
  • Most studies measured immediate reactions or learning outcomes, with few assessing changes in student behavior
  • No studies explored long-term clinical outcomes for service users.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The inclusion of Service User Involvement (SUI) in higher education, particularly within Allied Health Professions (AHP) programs, has been increasingly mandated by professional standards globally. This scoping review aimed to systematically map existing literature on active SUI in undergraduate AHP education to identify types of involvement activities, how involvement is measured and to identify gaps in the current evidence base. Methods Using PRISMA‐ScR, a comprehensive search was conducted across five major databases; OVID Medline, OVID Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and PsycINFO alongside grey literature. Analysis of results was framed using Towle's taxonomy and the Kirkpatrick evaluation model. Results Twenty‐five studies met the inclusion criteria. Most involvement was with occupational therapy students ( n = 13) followed by physiotherapy students ( n = 7). Most studies documented SUI primarily in teaching delivery ( n = 20), with less involvement in curriculum design ( n = 2). The review highlighted limited engagement at higher levels of Towle's taxonomy, where they act as equal partners in educational processes. Regarding the Kirkpatrick model, most measured impact by immediate reactions (Level 1) or learning outcomes (Level 2), and few explored changes in student behaviour (Level 3). None of the included studies measured long‐term clinical outcomes (Level 4). Variability in terminology and practices was reported. Conclusion This scoping review highlights the increasing value of (SUI) in undergraduate AHP education. Addressing barriers and standardising implementation are key to advancing meaningful engagement. Future research should explore the long‐term impact of SUI on clinical practice and patient outcomes. Patient and Public Involvement A special interest group of service‐users were regularly consulted. They provided feedback on the search terms and all draft versions of the review.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shand et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828010fc35cd7a8847144https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70575
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper