Key result
Bisoprolol reduces peak VO2 by ~2.5 ml/kg/min in non-obstructive HCM, and verapamil lacks functional benefit.
Why the study?
Evidence from randomized trials for beta-blocker and verapamil therapy in non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was absent.
Does bisoprolol or verapamil improve functional capacity and symptoms in patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Does bisoprolol or verapamil improve functional capacity and symptoms in patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
In patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, bisoprolol worsens functional capacity and symptoms compared to verapamil and placebo, while verapamil reduces NT-proBNP without affecting functional capacity.
Avoid bisoprolol in non-obstructive HCM; challenges beta-blocker preference and leaves verapamil's functional role open.
Background Evidence for beta-blocker and verapamil therapy in non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) from randomized trials is absent. Purpose To assess the effects of bisoprolol and verapamil on functional capacity and symptoms in non-obstructive HCM. Methods A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, triple-crossover trial performed at two tertiary referral centers. HCM patients without left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (< 30 mmHg during any conditions) and with a maximal left ventricular wall thickness ≥15 mm, having ≥1 marker of disease severity: NYHA class ≥II, NT-proBNP >300 ng/l, or documented non-sustained ventricular tachycardia were eligible for study participation. Patients were randomized into six different sequences of bisoprolol-, verapamil- and placebo-treatment. Patients underwent three treatment periods with target doses of bisoprolol 7.5 mg, verapamil 360 mg, and placebo, respectively, or maximal tolerable doses. Outcomes were evaluated after two weeks of steady-state treatment. The primary outcome, peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) in comparison between bisoprolol and verapamil treatment, was obtained through cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Secondary outcomes were symptoms (KCCQ-OSS) and NT-proBNP. Both treatments were compared to placebo. Results Thirty-two patients, age 54±15 years, 11 females, were included. The pVO2, was 25.7±8.7 ml/kg/min with bisoprolol versus 28.6±9.8 ml/kg/min with verapamil, with an adjusted mean difference of 2.3 ml/kg/min (95% CI: 0.7 to 3.8, p= 0.004). The adjusted mean difference in KCCQ-OSS was 4.3 points (95% CI: 0.7 to 8.0, p= 0.019) and in NT-proBNP, 275 ng/L (CI 95%: 221 to 320, p<0.001), both in favor of verapamil. Compared to placebo, bisoprolol reduced pVO2 by 2.5 ml/kg/min (95% CI: 1.0 to 4.1, p=0.005), while verapamil only reduced it by 0.2 ml/kg/min (95% CI: -1.3 to 1.8, p=1.000). The adjusted mean differences to placebo in KCCQ-OSS was 6.6 points, (95% CI: 3.0 to 10.3, p=0.001) with bisoprolol and 2.3 points (95% CI: -1.4 to 6.0, p=0.668) with verapamil. Verapamil reduced NT-proBNP by 155 ng/L (95% CI: 81 to 242, p<0.001), whereas bisoprolol increased NT-proBNP by 132 ng/L (95% CI: 52 to 200 ng/L, p=0.006) compared to placebo (Figure 1). Conclusion Bisoprolol reduces functional capacity and increases symptoms as well as NT-proBNP compared to verapamil and placebo in non-obstructive HCM. Verapamil reduces NT-proBNP, but no differences in functional capacity or symptoms was identified compared to placebo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bjerregaard et al. (2025) studied this question. Bisoprolol reduced peak VO2 by 2.5 ml/kg/min and worsened symptoms and NT-proBNP; verapamil lowered NT-proBNP by 155 ng/L but did not improve functional capacity in non-obstructive HCM.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: