A predictive model using valve opening angle and acceleration time differentiated causes of high prosthetic aortic valve gradients with AUC 0.94-0.98.
Does a predictive model using clinical and imaging parameters accurately differentiate between causes of high-gradient mechanical prosthetic aortic valves in affected patients?
A predictive model using simple imaging parameters like valve opening angle and acceleration time can accurately differentiate between patient-prosthesis mismatch, thrombus, and pannus in high-gradient mechanical aortic valves.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Abstract Aim In managing prosthetic heart valves (PHV), increased transvalvular gradients present significant diagnostic challenges, often requiring advanced multimodality imaging (MMI). Predictive models can offer valuable insights in resource-limited settings. This study aimed to develop a predictive model to differentiate between causes of high mechanical prosthetic aortic valve gradients. Methods and Results This retrospective study, conducted at a tertiary cardiology center, included 159 patients with high-gradient mechanical prosthetic aortic valves admitted between February 2020 and April 2024. Clinical evaluations involved detailed examinations, laboratory findings, time in therapeutic range (TTR), and MMI techniques. Among the patients, 102 had patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM), 22 had thrombus, and 35 had pannus-related high-gradients. A multivariate multinomial logistic regression model was used to predict the diagnostic groups. The most significant variables, according to partial chi-square values, were PHV opening angle, acceleration time (AT), PHV age (5 years), PHV size, and effective TTR. PHV opening angle and AT explained 65% of the outcome variation. The model’s macro-average multi-class AUC was 0.95, with individual AUC values of 0.98, 0.94, and 0.94 for mismatch, thrombus, and pannus, respectively. The polytomous discrimination index (PDI) was 0.87 overall. Conclusion This study developed a predictive model to distinguish between PPM, thrombus, and pannus formation in high-gradient mechanical aortic valves. Valve opening angle and acceleration time were the most significant predictors. The model supports the use of simple tools like echocardiography and cinefluoroscopy, especially in settings without advanced imaging.Figure-1 Figure-2
Guler et al. (Sat,) reported a other. A predictive model using valve opening angle and acceleration time differentiated causes of high prosthetic aortic valve gradients with AUC 0.94-0.98.