Key result
HCM linked to ~4-fold higher risk of death or HF rehospitalization after AF ablation.
Why the study?
AF disproportionately affects patients with HCM, contributing to morbidity and mortality, but whether they have worse outcomes than non-HCM patients with AF under contemporary AF management remained unclear.
Does the presence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy worsen outcomes (mortality and heart failure rehospitalization) in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation compared to non-HCM patients?
Does the presence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy worsen outcomes (mortality and heart failure rehospitalization) in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation compared to non-HCM patients?
Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation face a more than 4-fold higher risk of mortality and heart failure rehospitalization compared to matched non-HCM patients.
May warrant intensified post-ablation surveillance in HCM; extends observational data but leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Background/Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) disproportionately affects patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), contributing to morbidity and mortality. Purpose This study investigated whether HCM patients with AF have worse outcomes than non-HCM patients with AF under contemporary AF management. Methods In this nationwide cohort study using data from 2015 to 2022, patients with HCM and AF undergoing AF catheter ablation were 1:1 propensity score-matched to patients with AF but without HCM undergoing AF catheter ablation. As assessed in a time-to-event analysis, the primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and rehospitalisation for heart failure. Results After matching, 142 patients with HCM hospitalised for AF catheter ablation (median age of 60 years, 28.9% female) were compared to 142 non-HCM patients hospitalised for AF catheter ablation (median age of 60 years, 27.5% female). Over a median follow-up of 34 months, the incidence rate of the primary outcome was higher in the HCM group at 56.2 per 1,000 patient-years, compared to 13.4 per 1,000 patient-years in the non-HCM group (hazard ratio [HR], 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 10.2). The individual incidence rates of all-cause mortality (24.4 vs. 6.6 per 1,000 patient years; HR, 3.6 [95% CI, 1.0 to 13.0]) and rehospitalisation for heart failure (34.2 vs. 6.7 per 1,000 patient years; HR, 5.1 [95% CI, 1.5 to 17.9]) were higher in the HCM group. Conclusion Over a median follow-up of nearly three years, patients with HCM and AF treated with catheter ablation had higher rates of all-cause mortality and rehospitalisation for heart failure compared to non-HCM patients with AF undergoing the same procedure. These findings highlight the substantial and persistent burden of morbidity in HCM patients with AF, even with contemporary treatment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schelldorfer et al. (2025) studied this question. HCM patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation had 4.2-fold higher risk of death or heart failure rehospitalization (56.2 vs 13.4 per 1,000 patient-years) than non-HCM.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: