Key result
Pre-existing AF linked to ~39% higher 1-year mortality post-TAVI without raising stroke risk.
Why the study?
How AF affects clinical outcomes after TAVI remains conflicting, prompting evaluation of the impact of pre-existing and new-onset AF.
Does pre-existing or new-onset atrial fibrillation increase the risk of mortality or stroke in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI?
Does pre-existing or new-onset atrial fibrillation increase the risk of mortality or stroke in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI?
In patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI, neither pre-existing nor new-onset atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of stroke, though pre-existing AF increases 1-year mortality and new-onset AF increases early major bleeding risk.
Pre-existing AF flags higher post-TAVI mortality without stroke excess; leaves open whether targeted antithrombotic strategies improve survival.
Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a frequent comorbidity in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). In addition, new-onset AF can occur as a complication of TAVI. However, how AF affects clinical outcomes remains conflicting. Purpose Evaluate the impact of pre-existing and new-onset AF on outcomes after TAVI. Methods CENTER2 is an international patient-level pooled cohort that includes patients who underwent TAVI between 2007 and 2022. Clinical outcomes were compared in patients with and without pre-existing AF. Rates of new-onset atrial fibrillation at 30 days were evaluated in patients without pre-existing AF that survived the index hospitalisation, since new-onset AF shares a competing risk with death. Results A total of 23,320 patients (56.1% female; mean age 81.5±6.7 years) underwent transfemoral TAVI of whom 6579 (28.2%) had pre-existing atrial fibrillation. 1-year mortality was higher patients with AF than without (19.0% vs 14.2%, adjusted HR 1.39, 95%CI 1.26-1.53, p<0.001). Stroke rates were comparable at 30-day (2.4% vs 2.2%, p=0.47) and 1-year (7.2% vs 6.9%, p=0.57) follow-up. Only 76.8% (n=3140) of patients with AF were discharged on oral anticoagulation. Stroke rates in these patients did not differ significantly from those with AF and anticoagulation at discharge: at 30-day (2.5% vs 2.0%, p=0.33) and 1-year follow-up (6.5% vs 6.4%, p=0.98). Use of vitamin K antagonists was associated with higher bleeding rates compared to patients on direct oral anticoagulants (8.2% vs 4.6%, OR 1.83, 95%CI 1.35-2.49, p<0.001). There was no difference in 30-day stroke rates by anticoagulant type (1.7% vs 1.4%, p=0.54). However, 1-year stroke rates were lower in patients treated with vitamin K antagonists (5.5% vs 9.9%, OR 0.53, 95%CI 0.28-1.00, p=0.05). In patients without pre-existing AF who survived the index hospitalization, 681 (6.2%) had new-onset AF after TAVI. There were no differences in 1-year mortality (11.1% vs 8.6%, p=0.09) in patients with and without new-onset AF. Similarly, stroke incidence was comparable at 30 days (2.2% vs 2.1%, p=0.92) and 1-year (8.1% vs. 6.0%, p=0.16). Only 48.1% of patients with new-onset AF were discharged on anticoagulation, but there were no significant differences in rates of stroke compared with patients with new-onset AF and anticoagulation (1.8% vs 2.7%, p=0.50). However, new-onset AF was associated with higher rates of 30-day major bleeding (12.0% vs 6.7%, OR 1.90, 95%CI 1.49-2.43, p<0.001). Conclusions Pre-existing and new-onset AF in patients that undergo TAVI are not associated with higher risk for stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nieuwkerk et al. (2025) studied this question. Pre-existing AF increased 1-year mortality post-TAVI (19.0% vs 14.2%, HR 1.39), while neither pre-existing nor new-onset AF raised stroke risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: