Randomized clinical trial examines pain relief and mouth movement in temporomandibular joint issues, suggesting injectable solutions may help.
This study aims to explore the effectiveness of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (I-PRF) and concentrated platelet-rich fibrin (C-PRF) in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) internal derangements. Patients with TMJ complaints were randomly divided into three groups in which arthrocentesis alone, arthrocentesis and I-PRF injections, or arthrocentesis and C-PRF injections were applied. Pain levels, maximum mouth opening (MMO), TMJ movements, and sounds were recorded preoperatively, postoperatively, at the 1st week, 1st month, and 3rd month; Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and mandibular dysfunction were evaluated preoperatively and at 3 months. 30 patients (mean age 41 ± 12.19) were included. Although I-PRF and C-PRF groups were found more effective clinically, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding pain level, MMO, and TMJ movements except for differences at postoperative-1st week (p = 0.023) for MMO and preoperative-1st month (p = 0.043), preoperative-3rd month (p = 0.005) and 1st week-3rd month (p = 0.007) for left lateral movement. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of the Oral Health Impact Scale-14 (OHIP-14) and Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ) (p > 0.05). Although not significant, slightly improved values in the I-PRF group for pain and in the C-PRF group during the acute phase for pain and MMO suggest that I-PRF and, during the acute phase, C-PRF may be preferred after arthrocentesis to enhance clinical outcomes. However, these results still require more research on larger samples to be validated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yilmaz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: