Systematic review reports long-term effectiveness of pembrolizumab in advanced NSCLC, suggesting its viability in clinical practice.
Background Pembrolizumab monotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50%. However, long-term effectiveness and safety in real-world populations remain underexplored. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library through February 2025 for real-world studies reporting outcomes of first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 ≥ 50%, excluding those with EGFR/ALK alterations. Primary outcomes were pooled mean overall survival (OS), timepoint-specific OS rates, and progression-free survival. Secondary outcomes included adverse event rates and hazard ratios (HRs) for OS based on age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, PD-L1 intensity, and brain metastases. Kaplan–Meier curves were digitally reconstructed using R. Results In total, 12 studies encompassing 17,506 patients were included. The pooled mean OS was 21.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.9–25.1), and the 60-month OS rate was 29.0%. Mean progression-free survival was 8.7 months (95% CI 6.3–11.0). Any-grade and grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 52% and 12% of patients, respectively. Age ≥70 years was associated with worse OS (HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.23–1.29). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status ≥2 was also linked to poorer outcomes (HR 2.05; 95% CI 1.04–4.05). No significant OS difference was observed for PD-L1 or brain metastases. Conclusions Real-world evidence confirms the long-term effectiveness and safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥50%. Survival outcomes closely mirrored those from previous trials, supporting the generalizability of pembrolizumab’s benefit across routine practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Machado et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: