Classical Namba forcing demonstrates the weak countable approximation property in certain models, indicating its consistency.
We show that it is consistent from an inaccessible cardinal that classical Namba forcing has the weak ω 1 ω _1 -approximation property. In fact, this is the case if ℵ 1 _1 -preserving forcings do not add cofinal branches to ℵ 1 _1 -sized trees. The exact statement we obtain is similar to Hamkins’ Key Lemma. It follows as a corollary that Martin’s Maximum ( M M MM ) implies that there are stationarily many indestructibly weakly ω 1 ω _1 -guessing models that are not internally unbounded. This answers a question of Cox and Krueger and partially answers another. Our result on M M MM gives a short proof of a weakening of Cox and Krueger’s main result by removing their use of higher Namba forcings, but we find another application of their ideas by answering a question of Adolf, Apter, and Koepke on preservation of successive cardinals by singularizing forcings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maxwell Levine (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: