PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026SLEEP2 citationsOpen Access

Effect of electronic nicotine delivery systems for smoking cessation on sleep quality: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

View Full Paper
TSTamara ScharfARAnna RihsASAnna Schoeni

Key Points

  • The main aim was to evaluate how e-cigarettes for quitting smoking affect sleep quality.
  • Conducted secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial in Switzerland.
  • Intervention group received e-cigarettes and counseling, while the control group received counseling alone.
  • Measured sleep quality using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at 6 months.
  • Utilized adjusted linear regressions with inverse probability of attrition weights.
  • No significant overall difference in sleep quality between intervention and control groups.
  • Sleep efficiency was significantly better in the intervention group but below the minimum clinically important difference.
  • 831 participants completed the sleep quality assessment at follow-up.

Abstract

Abstract Study Objectives E-cigarettes can help smokers quit, but how e-cigarettes used for tobacco smoking cessation impact sleep is still unclear. The primary objective was to evaluate the effect of e-cigarettes for smoking abstinence on sleep quality. Secondary objectives included subscales of sleep quality. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of the Efficacy, Safety, and Toxicology of electronic nicotine delivery systems for smoking cessation (ESTxENDS) randomized controlled trial, which included adult smokers in Switzerland (5 sites, 7.2018-6.2021). The intervention group received free e-cigarettes and e-liquids over 6 months plus standard-of-care smoking-cessation counseling (SOC); the control group received SOC alone. The primary outcome was overall self-reported sleep quality at 6 months, measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). We considered a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 2.5-5. Secondary outcomes included PSQI subscales. We used adjusted linear regressions with inverse probability of attrition weights (IPAW). Results ESTxENDS included 1246 participants. Of these, 831 participants completed the PSQI at follow-up. For the primary outcome, there was no significant difference in PSQI score between groups (b=-0.20, p=.256, adjusted analyses with IPAW). For PSQI subscales, only sleep efficiency was significantly better in the intervention group (b=1.87, p=.018), below MCID. Conclusion E-cigarettes added to SOC for tobacco smoking abstinence did not significantly alter participant’s self-reported sleep quality compared to SOC alone. Clinicians can inform patients willing to quit smoking with e-cigarettes that their use is not likely to disrupt their perceived sleep quality on average.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Scharf et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828850fc35cd7a8848092https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag028
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper