Key result
Systematic follow-up after left-sided infective endocarditis linked to ~85% lower mortality than missed visits.
Why the study?
Does systematic early follow-up improve the detection of complications and reduce mortality in patients discharged after left-sided infective endocarditis?
Cohort (n=242)
No
Does systematic early follow-up improve the detection of complications and reduce mortality in patients discharged after left-sided infective endocarditis?
Absolute Event Rate: 6% vs 41%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Standardized early follow-up after left-sided infective endocarditis frequently identifies asymptomatic complications and is associated with significantly lower mortality compared to missed follow-up.
Background Infective endocarditis (IE) is a severe disease with high mortality. While in-hospital management is well defined, follow-up after discharge remains less established. Significant complications can occur following hospitalization for IE and a standardized follow-up may allow early identification and management. Purpose This study aimed to describe the prevalence and characteristics of complications of left-sided IE within 6±3 months after discharge and evaluate the impact of early screening on patient management. Methods From September, 2020, to April, 2024, all surviving patients after an hospitalization for left-sided IE in a tertiary center of cardiology were prospectively included. At discharge, a systematic follow-up, including a medical consultation, blood tests, an echocardiography and supplementary investigations with cardiac and/or cerebral computed tomography scan when indicated, has been scheduled at 1 and 6±3 months. Results During the study period, 311 patients were treated for left-sided IE with an in-hospital mortality rate of 22%, the 242 survivors were included (Table 1). The mean age was 65±15 years, 45% had prosthetic valve IE, and 57% underwent surgery. The recommended follow-up was completed by 210 (87%) patients (median time, 6[3–8] months). A total of 77 (32%) patients experienced complications (Table 2), including recurrent IE (n=8), periprosthetic leaks (n=7), paravalvular pseudoaneurysms (n=8), significant regurgitation (n=17), and stroke (n=8). Notably, 43/77 (56%) patients were asymptomatic at diagnosis. Thanks to systematic follow-up, among the 15 patients who required cardiac surgery, 10 patients were operated at an early asymptomatic stage. The global mortality rate during follow-up was 10%. Mortality was significantly higher among patients who missed the scheduled examinations (13/32; 41% vs. 12/210; 6% in the rest of the cohort; p<0.0001). Conclusion Standardized follow-up after left-sided IE frequently identifies early post-hospital complications, often in asymptomatic patients. Early detection seems to positively impact management and could improve prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farwati et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Left-sided infective endocarditis (n=242). Systematic follow-up vs. Missed scheduled examinations was evaluated on Mortality during follow-up (p=<0.0001). Systematic follow-up after left-sided infective endocarditis was associated with significantly lower mortality compared to missing scheduled examinations (6% vs 41%, p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: