Key result
Pre-close suture technique yields similar 1-year femoral vein complication rates to post-close closure.
Why the study?
Does the pre-close technique compared to the post-close technique using suture-mediated vascular closure systems improve long-term safety and re-accessibility in patients undergoing elective catheter ablation via femoral vein access?
RCT (n=282)
Randomized into pre-close or post-close groups
Does the pre-close technique compared to the post-close technique using suture-mediated vascular closure systems improve long-term safety and re-accessibility in patients undergoing elective catheter ablation via femoral vein access?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 2%
p-value: p=0.50
Suture-mediated vascular closure systems for femoral vein access during catheter ablation are safe long-term and allow for successful repeat access regardless of whether a pre-close or post-close technique is used.
Background Long-term safety and re-accessibility following the use of suture-mediated vascular closure systems (SMC) for femoral vein access are not well-documented. Purpose This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes and the feasibility of repeat punctures in the femoral vein after the application of SMC. Methods We analyzed 282 patients undergoing elective catheter ablation via femoral vein access with an 8–13 F sheath. Patients were randomized into pre-close or post-close groups using the ProGlide/ProStyle single-suture technique. Duplex ultrasound evaluations were performed on Day 1, Day 90, and at 1 year to evaluate vascular complications. Primary and secondary endpoints included major and minor complications within 1 year. Re-accessibility was assessed in patients requiring repeat procedures. Results Twenty-one patients (14.9%) in the pre-close group and 16 patients (11.3%) in the post-close group underwent repeat procedure, achieving successful re-access in all cases. The long-term safety analysis included 91 patients (64.5%) from the pre-close group and 98 patients (69.5%) from the post-close group. Major complications rate was 2/189 (1.1%) and minor complications rate was 28/189 (14.8%) in total. There was no difference in complication rates between the pre-close group (0/91, 0.0% major, 12/91, 13.2% minor) and post-close group (2/98, 2% major, 16/98, 16.3% minor), with P-values of 0.50 and 0.68, respectively. No new vascular stenosis occurred during the chronic phase in either group. Conclusion In long-term follow-up after femoral vein access using SMC, new onset of chronic stenosis was not observed and re-access was possible in multiple procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chikata et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Elective catheter ablation via femoral vein access (n=282). Pre-close single-suture technique (ProGlide/ProStyle) vs. Post-close single-suture technique was evaluated on Major complications within 1 year (p=0.50). The pre-close single-suture technique for femoral vein access resulted in similar major (0.0% vs 2.0%, P=0.50) and minor complications compared to the post-close technique at 1 year.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: