This research compares struvite and inorganic fertilizers in promoting plant growth, indicating a sustainable agriculture approach.
This research was conducted as a result of the need to produce more food for the growing population, to create a clean environment by channelling urine properly and for job creation. In this study, the effects of struvite (fertilizer obtained from human urine) and inorganic fertilizers (NPK 20:10:10 and urea) were compared on the growth of Cucurbita maxima (ugbogulu/ anyu). Four treatment groups, which included: control (no application), NPK 20:10:10, urea fertilizer and struvite group were successfully employed. Data on plant growth parameters collected were: plant height, number of leaves, leaf area and stem girth of the plants. Chlorophyll content, vitamin C content and mineral content were also determined according to the method of Arnon, (1949), Klein & Perry, (1982) and APHA, (1995) respectively. The results showed that plants grown with struvite had a higher percentage change in plant height (91%) and the average plant height in 6-week harvest data was 23.78±1.08. The average number of the leaves in the struvite group was the highest (7.50±0.96), while the average number of the leaves in the urea group was the lowest (4.67±0.43). The struvite group had the highest average final stem girth (2.43±0.12) when compared with other groups. Plants treated with struvite fertilizer had the highest vitamin C content, highest average chlorophyll B content, and highest potassium content. Therefore, it is recommended to use struvite as a cheap source of fertilizer for promoting plant growth and making sanitation systems economically more attractive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Obiefuna et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: