Key result
Persistently high NT-proBNP one year after ACS linked to ~39% greater MACE risk.
Why the study?
The prognostic value of longitudinal changes in NT-pro BNP levels after acute coronary syndrome remained uncertain.
Does persistently high NT-pro BNP at 1 year follow-up predict an increased risk of MACE in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Does persistently high NT-pro BNP at 1 year follow-up predict an increased risk of MACE in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Persistently high NT-pro BNP at 1 year after an acute coronary syndrome is an independent predictor of increased MACE risk, identifying a high-risk cohort that may benefit from aggressive secondary prevention.
Background Temporal biomarker dynamics have been investigated in predicting cardiovascular (CV) outcome after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the value of longitudinal changes in NT-pro BNP levels after the ACS is uncertain. Purpose The aim of the present study was to evaluate outcomes according to NT-pro BNP trajectory throughout 1 year follow-up after ACS. Methods Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients admitted to four Swiss University Hospitals and enrolled in the multicenter SPUM registry between 2009 and 2017 were followed prospectively for 1 year. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular (MACE); i.e., non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) or major bleeding) at 1 year. Persistently high NT-pro BNP was defined as >125 pg/ml at baseline as well as at 1 year follow-up. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression models were fit to estimate MACE risk. Results Out of 4’787 ACS patients, 1704 (35,6%) presented persistently high NT-pro BNP. These patients were older (64.2±12.7 vs 63.2±11.2 years, p=0.011), had similar rate of traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors with the exception of a slightly lower prevalence of hypercholesterolemia (60.0% vs 65.2%, p>0.001). Further, they had fewer prior CV events, such as previous MI (9.8% vs 13.9, p<0.001) and previous percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI; 11.2% vs 17.4%, p<0.001). The initial presentation was more frequently NSTEMI (49.1% vs 39.9%, p<=.001) and they were more often pharmacologically undertreated (all p<0.001). Glomerular filtration rate was slightly lower (83.0±22.8 vs 84.3±19.7, p=0.021) in those with persistently high NT-pro BNP and they also had increased inflammation as reflected by plasma levels of high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP 16.3±36.3 vs 8.6±22.3 mg/l, p<0.001 and NLR 6.9±1.8 vs 4.9±1.1, p<0.001). Lastly, persistently high NT-pro BNP was associated with a higher rate of MACE at 1 year (7.1% vs 5.2%, p=0.006). This enhanced risk persisted after adjustment for confounding baseline characteristics (adjusted HR 1.39, 95%CI 1.04-1.85, p=0.02, Figure 1, Panel A) and they were linked to the highest risk of MACE (Figure 1, Panel B) compared to all other groups. Conclusions Persistently high NT-pro BNP at 1 year follow-up is associated with increased risk of MACE at 1 year. Patients with persistently high NT-pro BNP coincide with the highest risk of MACE compared to those with persistently low levels or change in NT-pro BNP determination. Thus, these features should alert physicians to implement aggressive secondary prevention in such patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denegri et al. (2025) studied this question. Persistently high NT-pro BNP (>125 pg/ml) one year after ACS occurs in 35.6% of patients and is associated with 39% higher adjusted risk of MACE at 1 year (HR 1.39).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: