This article reviews wireless power transfer technologies and energy management in intracranial BCI implants, suggesting improvements for clinical safety.
This article explores the critical challenge of powering intracranial brain-computer interface (BCI) implants, emphasizing that while these systems offer superior signal quality, their long-term viability is hindered by the limitations of batteries and the infection risks of wired connections. To address this, the author reviews various wireless power transfer (WPT) technologies, particularly inductive and resonance-based electromagnetic methods, while highlighting the biophysical hurdles such as tissue heating (SAR), signal attenuation by the skull, and the necessity for extreme miniaturization. The paper argues that open-loop systems are insufficient due to unpredictable power fluctuations caused by head movements and anatomical variability; instead, it advocates for closed-loop systems with real-time feedback, power-data co-design strategies like backscatter communication, and scalable architectures for distributed microscale implants to ensure clinical safety and operational stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nilsu Arasıl (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: