Longitudinal mediation shows coping through meaning impacts spiritual well-being in mothers of children with disabilities, suggesting key psychological mechanisms.
Mothers of children with disabilities often face persistent caregiving demands that elevate psychological distress and may adversely affect spiritual well-being, a key psychological resource related to meaning and life purpose. Drawing on stress and coping frameworks, the present study examined coping through meaning as a longitudinal mediating mechanism linking psychological distress to spiritual well-being among mothers of children with disabilities. Using a semi-longitudinal design, data were collected at two time points separated by three months from a final sample of 343 Turkish mothers of children with disabilities ( M age = 34.65, SD = 5.64). A cross-lagged panel model within a structural equation modeling framework was estimated. Psychological distress at Time 1 negatively predicted coping through meaning at Time 2 ( β = −.183, p < .01, 95% CI[−.318, −.043]). Coping through meaning at Time 1 positively predicted spiritual well-being at Time 2 ( β = .277, p < .01, 95% CI[.166, .386]), and psychological distress at Time 1 also showed a direct negative effect on spiritual well-being at Time 2 ( β = −.129, p < .01, 95% CI[−.244, −.016]). Mediation analyses indicated a significant indirect effect of psychological distress on spiritual well-being via coping with meaning (standardized indirect effect = −.034, 95% CI [−.052, −.010]), indicating partial longitudinal mediation. These findings suggest that psychological distress undermines mothers’ ability to engage in meaning-making, which in turn contributes to reduced spiritual well-being over time. The results highlight coping through meaning as a key psychological mechanism and have implications for meaning-centered interventions in psychological counseling and family support programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özge Erduran Tekin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: