Coleman examines Ulrich's response to Heidegger's idea of nothingness, revealing its enabling role in understanding being.
Rachel M. Coleman examines Heidegger’s notion of das Nichts in What is Metaphysics?, where asking “How is it with the nothing?” serves as the proper occasion for metaphysics. It contrasts Heidegger’s view, in which the nothing nihilates beings and obstructs their disclosure, with Ferdinand Ulrich’s Thomistic response in Homo Abyssus, where created beings, grounded in non-subsisting esse, reveal themselves inexhaustibly. Ulrich recasts nothingness as enabling, rather than obstructing, the encounter with the depth and gift of being.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rachel Coleman (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: