Introduces Metamonism, highlighting its role in transforming hermeneutic ontology into a generative paradigm.
Twentieth-century philosophy successfully established process and becoming as fundamental traits of reality. However, this achievement remained descriptive: becoming was recognized, but never derived. This paper introduces Metamonism as a methodological shift from axiom-based ontology toward ontological prohibition (generative constraint). Instead of asserting being or interpreting its meaning, Metamonism eliminates absolute identity as a logically impossible state. Becoming emerges not as a postulate but as a necessary consequence. This marks a transition from hermeneutic ontology to architectural reasoning over ad-missible states.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrii Myshko (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: