Key result
Adding MIG to MCG is linked to higher CAD detection sensitivity at ~94%.
Why the study?
Does the integration of magnetoionography (MIG) improve the diagnostic accuracy of magnetocardiography (MCG) for detecting coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Population
129 participants undergoing non-invasive magnetocardiography recordings prior to coronary angiography
Comparison
Magnetoionography integrated with… vs Conventional magnetocardiography (MCG) alone
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
The addition of magnetoionography (MIG) to conventional magnetocardiography (MCG) improves the sensitivity and specificity for non-invasive detection of coronary artery disease.
Observational (n=129)
Does the integration of magnetoionography (MIG) improve the diagnostic accuracy of magnetocardiography (MCG) for detecting coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Absolute Event Rate: 93.5% vs 90.3%
p-value: p=<0.01
The addition of magnetoionography (MIG) to conventional magnetocardiography (MCG) improves the sensitivity and specificity for non-invasive detection of coronary artery disease.
Dischl et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=129). Magnetoionography (MIG) vs. Conventional magnetocardiography (MCG) was evaluated on Sensitivity for CAD detection (p=<0.01). Integrating magnetoionography (MIG) with conventional magnetocardiography (MCG) improved sensitivity for detecting coronary artery disease from 90.3% to 93.5% and specificity from 76.5% to 85.3%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: