PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026European Heart Journal0 citations

Impact of sex on procedural characteristics, safety and clinical outcomes of pulsed-field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation

View Full Paper
FJF JordanCardiovascular Institute HospitalCICorinne IseneggerUniversity Hospital of BaselJBJ BrueggerCardiovascular Institute Hospital

Key Result

Pulsed-field ablation showed higher 1-year atrial arrhythmia recurrence in women (23%) than men (11%) after propensity-score matching (OR 2.29, p=.004).

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes of pulsed-field ablation based on patient sex.
  • Conducted a prospective study with patients undergoing pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation.
  • Utilized a 1:1 propensity-score-matched cohort for sex comparison, matched on key health factors.
  • Followed up patients at 3, 6, and 12 months post-ablation.
  • 134 of 425 patients (32%) were female, who were older and had more paroxysmal AF than males.
  • Pulmonary vein isolation was successful in all patients with no significant differences in procedural times between sexes.
  • After propensity matching, 1-year recurrence rates were higher in females (23%) compared to males (11%).

Structured PICO

Does female sex increase the risk of atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
425 consecutive patients undergoing a first ablation for paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation using pulsed-field ablation (PFA), including 134 females (median age 70) and 291 males (median age 65).
I
Intervention
Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) for pulmonary vein isolation in female patients
C
Comparator
Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) for pulmonary vein isolation in male patients (analyzed via 1:1 propensity-score matching)
O
Outcome
1-year recurrence rates for any atrial arrhythmiashard clinical

Female sex is associated with a significantly higher risk of atrial arrhythmia recurrence at 1 year following pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation compared to propensity-matched male patients.

Abstract

Abstract Background Previous studies assessing the impact of patient sex on clinical outcomes using conventional thermal ablation techniques, such as radiofrequency or cryoablation, for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) have yielded mixed results. Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel, innovative AF ablation modality that offers selective myocardial tissue ablation. Little is known regarding the impact of sex on patients undergoing AF ablation using PFA. Aim We aim to compare the procedural characteristics, safety, and clinical outcomes of PFA in women and men undergoing a first AF ablation. Methods This prospective study included consecutive patients undergoing PFA for the treatment of paroxysmal or persistent AF. Follow-up was performed at 3, 6 and 12 months. To estimate the impact of sex on clinical outcomes a 1:1 propensity-score-matched cohort (matched for age, BMI, left atrial volume index and history of hypertension, stroke, coronary artery disease, diabetes, and heart failure) was performed. Results Of 425 patients undergoing AF ablation using PFA, 134 patients 32%) were female. Female patients, as compared with male patients, were significantly older ((median IQR age, 70 62, 75 years vs 65 58, 72 years; p .001), had more paroxysmal AF (61% 82 of 134 vs 45% 131 of 291; p = .002) and had less often coronary disease (4% 6 of 134 vs 14% 40 of 291; p= .029). Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was achieved in all patients. Additional ablation lesions beyond PVI were performed in 31% of female (41 of 134) and 33% of male (96 of 291; p= .70) patients. Median procedure time, LA dwell time and fluoroscopic times were similar in female and male patients. Overall, 2 (0.7%) complications occurred in men and 2 (1.5%; p= .371) in female patients. After propensity score matching (133 women to 133 men) the 1-year recurrence rates for any atrial arrhythmias were 23% (n=30) for females and 11% (n=15) for males (log-rank test; p=.004, Figure 1). Female Sex had an odds ratio of 2.29 for the occurrence of any atrial arrhythmia during long-term-follow-up. Conclusion Results of this cohort study suggest that there are important sex differences after PFA for treatment of AF. A better understanding of AF-causal sex-specific mechanisms and refinements in PFA technologies improve success rates in women.Figure 1

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jordan et al. (2025) studied this question. Pulsed-field ablation showed higher 1-year atrial arrhythmia recurrence in women (23%) than men (11%) after propensity-score matching (OR 2.29, p=.004).

synapsesocial.com/papers/698829520fc35cd7a8849828https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.490
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper