Investigating jet transitions from cavitation bubble interactions suggests implications for cavitation damage reduction.
Investigating the interaction between a near-wall cavitation bubble and an adjacent air bubble holds significant value for elucidating the micro-mechanism of aeration in mitigating cavitation damage. The morphological evolution of the cavitation bubble and the underlying mechanisms of jet direction transition are explored using a three-phase compressible model. This model incorporates the effects of multi-phase fluid compressibility, heat and mass transfer, and surface tension. The results reveal that the liquid jet generated by the collapse of a cavitation bubble can be categorized into three Patterns: (1) a single jet directed toward the wall, primarily influenced by the solid boundary; (2) a reversed jet induced by the repelling effect of the air bubble; and (3) double jets formed under the combined influence of both the air bubble and the wall. The two critical δ-values distinguishing these patterns are ∼1.0 and 2.0. The dynamic behaviors of the near-wall cavitation bubble, with and without the presence of an air bubble, are thoroughly analyzed to better understand the associated physical processes. Compared to the collapse of a single cavitation bubble, the presence of an air bubble significantly suppresses bubble expansion and collapse intensity, leading to a marked reduction in jet velocity and peak wall pressure. The jet velocity in the presence of the air bubble is reduced to ∼13.9% of that observed without it at γ = 0.8. The inhibitory effect of the air bubble on the near-wall cavitation bubble is more pronounced with decreasing γ2 and diminishes with increasing γ.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: