PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 9, 2026Materials Genome Engineering Advances0 citationsOpen Access

Deep Learning‐Based Prediction of Controllable Stress/Strain‐Rate Loading and Design for Loading Conditions

View Full Paper
YZYiwei ZhangWuhan University of TechnologyRZRuizhi ZhangWuhan University of TechnologyJJJunbang JiangHubei University of Technology

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a predictive model for controllable stress and strain rates during dynamic loading conditions.
  • Utilized graded density impactor (GDI) dynamic loading technique.
  • Conducted numerical simulations for shock wave transmission and layer-wise modulation.
  • Developed a convolutional neural network-bidirectional long short-term memory (CNN-BLSTM) model.
  • Predicted stress/strain-rate curves and loading velocity with high accuracy.
  • Achieved a prediction accuracy of R² = 0.95 for stress/strain-rate curves.
  • Obtained an R² = 0.99 for loading velocity predictions.
  • Demonstrated a successful decoupling mechanism for stress and strain-rate parameters.
  • Provided solutions for complex multi-physics coupling challenges.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The graded density impactor (GDI) dynamic loading technique serves as a crucial method for achieving controllable stress/strain‐rate loading, where the loading velocity and adaptability of GDI structural design critically govern the loading results. Numerical simulations of layer‐wise modulation and shock wave transmission revealed a decoupling mechanism for stress and strain‐rate parameters. Specifically, the loading velocity determines the overall magnitude, whereas variations in interlayer thickness modulate the specific strain‐rate loading path. Building on this, a branched convolutional neural network (CNN)‐bidirectional long short‐term memory model (BLSTM) is developed to simultaneously predict stress/strain‐rate curves achieving R 2 = 0.95 and loading velocity achieving R 2 = 0.99 while enabling GDI thickness design. This methodology resolves multi‐physics coupling challenges in curve prediction and offers solutions for time‐dependent issues in extreme conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69897983f0ec2af6756e7474https://doi.org/10.1002/mgea.70051
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper