Analyzes criteria influencing technology selection for small wastewater treatment plants, highlighting implications for decision-makers.
The rapid development of rural and peri-urban areas increases the demand for decentralized wastewater treatment systems. Small wastewater treatment plants (SWTPs) with a capacity below 2000 PE are becoming an important element of local water protection and circular-economy strategies, yet clear guidelines for selecting appropriate technologies are still lacking. This study analyzes the criteria used in decision-making for SWTPs from a multi-stakeholder perspective and evaluates the relative importance of technical, economic, environmental and social factors. The research was conducted in Poland and included a survey of 130 respondents representing six stakeholder groups (officials, operators, designers, contractors, scientists and residents). Respondents allocated weights to four main groups of criteria and assessed eleven detailed parameters on a 1–10 scale. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test with the Lilliefors correction to verify distribution assumptions, and the Kruskal–Wallis test to examine differences between stakeholder groups. The results show a consistent hierarchy of criteria, with technical reliability, treatment efficiency and operating costs ranked as the most important factors. Social and environmental aspects were assessed as relevant but secondary. Only minor differences between stakeholder groups were observed. The study highlights the need for integrated, multicriteria approaches in SWTP planning, particularly in dispersed rural areas. The findings may support local authorities, designers and investors in technology selection. The research is limited by the non-probability sampling strategy, the national scope of the dataset and the cross-sectional character of the survey.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mucha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: