This article analyzes the challenges of building guanxi relationships for effective fieldwork in China, highlighting their importance for academic labor and research quality.
This article aims to shed light on the conditions and challenges of conducting fieldwork in China today, presenting the authors’ experiences of building and maintaining guanxi relationships with research participants in China. We explore the benefits, tensions, implications for research quality, and rigour, as well as impacts on academic labour. A central conclusion is that academics must master both sentiment and instrumental elements of their guanxi network, without breaking the professional code of conduct. We hope our article can promote more academic conversation on these challenges, considering that, in practice, guanxi networks are crucial to successful field research experiences in China, where access to valuable participants has become increasingly constrained in recent years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: