Case description explores imaging challenges in diagnosing thrombus in patients with metastatic cancer, suggesting the need for confirmatory imaging.
Background: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening cause of stroke. In patients with active malignancy, dural venous sinus filling defects present a diagnostic challenge, as they may represent bland thrombosis, tumour thrombus or benign anatomic variants such as arachnoid granulations. Although anticoagulation is recommended for confirmed cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, guidance is limited when imaging findings are equivocal, or tumour involvement is suspected. Diagnostic misclassification may result in unnecessary anticoagulation or failure to treat thrombosis. Case description: A 66-year-old woman with a history of subtotal colectomy complicated by chronic malabsorption and newly diagnosed metastatic lung cancer underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging for staging. Imaging revealed multiple intracranial metastases and a heterogeneous filling defect within the posterior superior sagittal sinus, with mild sinus expansion and internal flow voids, raising concern for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis or tumour thrombus. Anticoagulation was initiated despite the patient remaining neurologically intact. Subsequent computed tomography angiography and venography demonstrated preserved venous flow and findings consistent with arachnoid granulations rather than thrombosis or tumour invasion, allowing anticoagulation to be discontinued. The patient’s altered gastrointestinal anatomy was clinically relevant, as it would have limited the reliability of direct oral anticoagulant therapy. Conclusions: This case demonstrates that magnetic resonance imaging alone may be insufficient to reliably differentiate cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, tumour thrombus and benign anatomic variants. In patients with active malignancy, confirmatory vascular imaging should be obtained before committing to prolonged anticoagulation. A structured, multimodal diagnostic approach can reduce misdirected therapy and unnecessary risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tareen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: