The role of noise pollution as a risk factor for Alzheimer disease (AD) is unclear, with observational studies yielding conflicting results susceptible to confounding and reverse causality. To clarify this relationship, we performed a 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study using summary statistics from large-scale genome-wide association studies of European populations. Genetically predicted daytime and evening noise exposure was used as an instrumental variable to assess a causal effect on AD risk. The primary analysis was conducted using the inverse-variance weighted method, with weighted median and MR-Egger methods as key sensitivity analyses. We assessed instrument validity and pleiotropy using the Cochran Q test, the MR-Egger intercept, and leave-one-out analysis. Our MR analysis found no evidence of a causal association between genetically predicted daytime noise (odds ratio 95% confidence interval = 0.999 0.993–1.006, P = .819) or evening noise (odds ratio 95% confidence interval = 0.999 0.993–1.005, P = .643) and the risk of AD. Sensitivity analyses were consistent, with no evidence of heterogeneity or directional pleiotropy. In conclusion, this study does not support a direct causal link between noise and AD. While our findings mitigate common observational biases, they do not preclude indirect mechanisms whereby noise may influence AD pathogenesis via established risk pathways, such as chronic sleep disruption and cardiovascular stress. Studies are needed to focus on disentangling these potential indirect effects.
Chen et al. (Fri,) studied this question.