A Conceptual AI-Based Framework for Clash Triage in Building Information Modeling (BIM): Towards Automated Prioritization in Complex Construction Projects

Effective clash management is critical to the success of complex construction projects, yet BIM coordinators face severe information overload when modern detection tools generate thousands or even millions of collision reports, making interdisciplinary coordination increasingly difficult. This article presents a conceptual framework for using AI for collision triage in a Building Information Modeling (BIM) environment. Previous approaches have focused mainly on collision detection itself and simple, rule-based prioritization, rarely exploiting the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods for post-processing of results, which constitutes the main innovation of this work. The proposed framework describes a modular system in which collision detection results and data from BIM models, schedules (4D), and cost estimates (5D) are processed by a set of AI components, offering adaptive, data-driven decision support unlike static rule-based methods. These include: a classifier that filters out irrelevant collisions (noise), algorithms that group recurring collisions into single design problems, a model that assesses the significance of collisions by determining a composite ‘AI Triage Score’ indicator, and a module that assigns responsibility to the appropriate trades and process participants. The framework leverages supervised machine learning methods (gradient boosting algorithms, selected for their effectiveness with tabular data) for noise filtering, density-based clustering (HDBSCAN, chosen for its ability to detect clusters of varying densities without predefined cluster count) for clash aggregation, and multi-criteria scoring models for priority assessment. The article also discusses a potential way to integrate the framework into the existing BIM workflow and possible scenarios for its validation based on case studies and expert evaluation. The proposed conceptual framework represents a step towards moving from manual, intuitive collision triage to a data- and AI-based approach, which can contribute to increased coordination efficiency, reduced risk of errors, and better use of design resources. As a conceptual study, the framework provides a foundation for future empirical validation and its limitations include dependency on historical training data availability and the need for calibration to project-specific contexts.