Explores policy changes following extreme storms in the Northeast, suggesting they create opportunities for climate adaptation.
Since 2010, several major extreme storm events have struck the Northeastern United States. Most significant of these in terms of extent and damage have been Tropical Storms Irene and Lee in 2011 and Hurricane Sandy in 2012. In addition to their individual impact, the fact that they occurred within a 15-month period (August 2011–October 2012) added extra significance and alerted stakeholders in the region to the increased likelihood of these types of events under the conditions of climate change. The objective of this study is to explore the policy legacies of these extreme events by examining the windows of opportunity they created for institutional learning, governance transformation, and climate adaptation. Using a mixed-method approach, including surveys and policy document analysis, we assess how policy responses varied across regions with different levels of storm impact and how these responses have evolved over time. The findings reveal that while the most heavily impacted areas, like New Jersey and New York, pursued comprehensive and transformative policy changes, even less affected regions perceived a window of opportunity for policy innovation. This extension of policy change beyond the immediate zones of impact highlights the role of collective awareness and inter-regional dependencies in driving adaptation strategies. The study further identifies significant variations in policy legacies across regions, influenced by factors such as perceived risk, resource availability, and political will. Higher-impact areas exhibited a sustained focus on infrastructure resilience and community adaptation, while lower-impact areas showed more limited changes, often centered on enhancing existing capacities. This research underscores the importance of fostering organizational learning and institutional memory to maintain the momentum for policy change and build resilient, adaptive communities in the face of escalating climate risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Setayesh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: