Blind challenges improve predictive modeling accuracy in drug discovery, indicating a shift towards collective evaluation.
The rapid proliferation of AI/ML models in drug discovery heralds an era of extraordinary progress but also raises urgent questions about whether the true predictive performance is as good as advertised. On-target prediction models often benefit from high-resolution structural or atomistic representations that capture the subtleties of binding affinity and pose. In contrast, off-target and ADMET liabilities have typically relied on more implicit representations of molecular interactions. Retrospective benchmarks often provide a misleading picture of how successful these diverse representations are at predicting properties, and the community lacks standardized, prospective comparisons. Blind challenges, such as the OpenADMET × ASAP × PolarisHub Challenge featured in this issue, are crucial for realistically evaluating progress, encouraging iterations, and directing collective efforts toward major accuracy barriers. With ongoing investment in large-scale, open data creation, and community-led challenges, predictive modeling is poised to rapidly transform drug discovery by enabling accurate, multiparameter optimization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chodera et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: