Retrospective analysis explores quality of life in nasal obstruction patients, suggesting etiology has limited impact.
Objectives: Nasal obstruction is a common presenting symptom in otolaryngology practice. Frequent etiologies include allergic and non-allergic rhinitis, inferior turbinate hypertrophy (HIT), and nasal septal deviation (DNS). This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between major causes of nasal obstruction and their effect on patient-reported quality of life (QoL). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients presenting with nasal obstruction who completed the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale, and a visual analog scale (VAS). Patients were categorized into three groups based on etiology: rhinitis, anatomical obstruction, or combined pathology. Results: The study included 170 patients (62% male), with a mean age of 38.4 years. Mean SNOT-22, NOSE, and VAS scores were 38, 61, and 6.5, respectively, with no statistically significant differences observed among the three etiologic groups. QoL outcomes were also comparable across anatomical subgroups, including isolated DNS, HIT, or combined findings. Among SNOT-22 domains, rhinologic symptoms demonstrated the highest burden. Patients with rhinitis exhibited significantly higher rhinologic and ear/facial symptom scores compared with patients with isolated anatomical obstruction (p = 0.04 and p = 0.005, respectively). Strong correlations were observed between SNOT-22, NOSE, and VAS scores across the entire cohort. Conclusions: Nasal obstruction is associated with substantial impairment in multiple domains of quality of life, independent of the underlying etiology. These findings highlight the broad impact of nasal obstruction on patient well-being. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further assess changes in quality of life following medical and surgical interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chvatinski et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: