Demonstrates improved falsification success in cyber-physical systems, indicating enhanced safety verification methods.
Robustness falsification is a critical verification task for ensuring the safety of cyber-physical systems (CPS). Under partially observable conditions, where internal states are hidden and only input–output data is accessible, existing deep reinforcement learning (DRL) approaches for CPS robustness falsification face two key limitations: inadequate temporal modeling due to unidirectional network architectures, and sparse reward signals that impede efficient exploration. These limitations severely undermine the efficacy of DRL in black-box falsification, leading to low success rates and high computational costs. This study addresses these limitations by proposing DRL-BiT-MPR, a novel framework whose core innovation is the synergistic integration of a bidirectional temporal network with a multi-granularity reward function. Specifically, the bidirectional temporal network captures bidirectional temporal dependencies, remedies inadequate temporal modeling, and complements unobservable state information. The multi-granularity reward function includes fine-grained, medium-grained and coarse-grained layers, corresponding to single-step local feedback, phased progress feedback, and global result feedback, respectively, providing multi-time-scale incentives to resolve reward sparsity. Experiments are conducted on three benchmark CPS models: the continuous CARS model, the hybrid discrete-continuous AT model, and the controller-based PTC model. Results show that DRL-BiT-MPR increases the falsification success rate by an average of 39.6% compared to baseline methods and reduces the number of simulations by more than 50.2%. The framework’s robustness is further validated through theoretical analysis of convergence and soundness properties, along with systematic parameter sensitivity studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xing et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: