PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 10, 2026Frontiers in Water2 citationsOpen Access

Bioremediation of heavy metals in contaminated water: conventional vs. advanced methods

SSSaurav SatiPSPradeep Kumar SharmaPNPratibha Naithani

Key Points

  • This work aims to compare effective methods for removing heavy metals from contaminated water.
  • Overview of conventional biological and physicochemical methods for heavy metals removal.
  • Assessment of advanced bioremediation techniques using plants and microorganisms.
  • Review of methods for detecting heavy metals with a focus on cost and applicability.
  • Discussion of hybrid approaches combining biological and physicochemical methods.
  • Conventional methods have limitations like high costs and energy consumption.
  • Bioremediation is identified as a sustainable and cost-effective alternative.
  • Hybrid methods using AI and nanotechnology show promise for enhanced remediation capabilities.

Abstract

Heavy metal (HM) contamination by cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), arsenic (As), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), and other toxic elements in the environment poses substantial threat to public health and different ecosystems. Originating from diverse anthropogenic and natural sources, these elements can induce several ecological disturbances and multi-organ toxicity in humans and wildlife. Conventional biological and physicochemical methods for the removal of HMs, though effective in some contexts, often have limitations such as being energy intensive, costly, and generation of secondary waste. As a result, there is growing interest in exploring cleaner, efficient, and more sustainable approaches like bioremediation. Bioremediation is progressively acknowledged as one of the cost effective and sustainable strategy for pollution abatement by employing plants, bacteria, and other microorganisms capable of eliminating, transforming, or immobilizing HMs. This work aims to provide an overview of the conventional and advanced methods for the remediation of HMs, weighing up their benefits and limitations. Various methods for detection of HMs are also reviewed highlighting suitability, sensitivity, cost, portability, and field applicability. Further, we have discussed about the synergistic advantages of combining biological and physicochemical methods over standalone approaches, highlighting the need of hybrid methods like integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and nanotechnology in bioremediation. Overall, this review highlights bioremediation as a pivotal strategy for achieving cleaner ecosystems and sustainability, while underscoring the need for further research to optimize bioremediation technologies for broader real-world environmental management applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sati et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698acaad7c832249c30b9f8dhttps://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2026.1749800
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper