Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates offline reinforcement learning methods to control arm movements in diverse users, suggesting advancements in functional electrical stimulation technology.
Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) can restore motor function; however, achieving precise multi-joint control remains challenging due to nonlinear muscle dynamics and fatigue. Reinforcement Learning (RL) offers a promising solution, but practical deployment is hindered by the need for patient-specific calibration. This study investigates offline RL approaches for controlling planar arm movements using heterogeneous datasets, aiming to enable zero-shot transfer to new users. We develop a biomechanical arm model in MuJoCo and evaluate four RL algorithms coupled with three offline techniques: conservative Q learning (SAC-CQL and QBR-CQL), Randomized Ensemble (QBR-REM), and distributional RL (IQNBR). Across all conditions, IQNBR demonstrates robust learning and superior control performance, achieving an average RMSE of 3.8±0.6 cm, even when trained on mixed-quality data. These results highlight the potential of distributional RL as a base learning method to build generic FES controllers that can operate without exhaustive calibration, with broader implications for controlling robots with human-like actuation systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wannawas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: