Numerical simulations reveal interactions between vortex structures and interfaces in immiscible fluids, indicating complex behavior based on density and surface tension.
In two-phase flow, the interaction between multi-scale vortex structures and interfaces (bubbles or free surfaces) triggers a range of complex physical phenomena. This study employs numerical simulations to investigate the interaction between a horizontal vortex and the interface separating two layers of immiscible fluids with different densities (e.g., water and air). The vortex is initialized as an internal motion within the heavier phase. We focus specifically on the impact of the phase density ratio and surface tension. Numerical simulations reveal that when the density ratio is near unity, interface rupture occurs only at high Weber numbers (We), where low surface tension enables the rupture of sharp interface points. Conversely, at high surface tension (low We), these sharp points stretch into thin liquid films, significantly increasing the surface area without causing breakage. As the density ratio increases, interface rupture at sharp points accelerates, even under high surface tension, leading to faster dissipation of the initial vortex. In high-We scenarios, an increased density ratio promotes the faster formation and greater intensity of new vortex layers at the interface. However, increasing surface tension enhances the vorticity of these layers but simultaneously slows their generation rate. The findings highlight the critical interplay between surface tension and density differences in vortex–interface interactions, with surface tension stabilizing the interface and density differences driving more intense vortex shedding and deformation. These insights offer valuable guidance for understanding two-phase flow behavior and improving the design of systems involving multiphase fluids.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: