This audit reviews FDM postulates and equations, identifying gaps and guiding future validation, indicating a collaborative approach.
This document is a conservative, protocol-oriented audit of the current FDM postulates and equations.It is intended as a transparent “shield” document: it lists what is defined, what is assumed, what is onlyproposed, and which equations/links remain to be derived or validated. No claims of established lawsare made.All statements, coefficients, and functional forms are provisional unless explicitly marked as algebraicidentities. The overall program is expected to require iterative peer feedback, data re-analysis, andmultiple years of refinement. Is intended as a conservative, deposition-ready culmination of thefirst stage of FDM (Ferreyra Dimensional Mechanics). It functions as a shield for scope: it explicitly catalogs what is currently defined, what isderived, what is empirical, and what remains missing. It is written to support careful review rather thanstrong claims.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferreyra Carlos (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: