Study demonstrates improved mechanical performance and sustainability in printable concrete using cellulose nanofibers and limestone filler, indicating significant cost benefits.
3D-printed concrete requires carefully tuned rheological properties to ensure successful printing. Achieving a balance between printability, mechanical performance, sustainability and cost remains a challenge due to high cement content and extensive use of chemical admixtures typically required to meet rheological constraints. In this study, we develop a high-performance, low-carbon, cost-effective printable concrete using cellulose nanofibers and limestone filler. Incorporation of 0.3% cellulose nanofibers with 29% limestone filler replacement increases the static yield stress, storage modulus, and critical strain by 1213%, 255%, and 542%, respectively, with a moderate impact on viscosity compared to the reference mixture. Microstructural analyses indicate that the limestone filler accelerates hydration and enhances early-age stiffening, while the cellulose nanofibers increase static yield stress through colloidal interactions. Cellulose nanofibers enhance both compressive and flexural strength, allowing up to a 40% reduction in cement content while maintaining mechanical performance. Robotic 3D printing of a large-scale element demonstrates the scalability of the developed mixture and underscores its potential for large scale applications. Finally, techno-economic analysis and life-cycle assessment further demonstrate the environmental and economic benefits of the proposed mixtures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: