Colorectal cancer (CRC) progression entails coordinated gene dysregulation and rewiring of signaling networks. Here, we investigated whether prefoldin subunit 2 (PFDN2) contributes to CRC progression by stabilizing pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase 2 (PYCR2) and thereby modulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Integrated analyses of TCGA-COAD/READ and other public datasets showed that PFDN2 and PYCR2 are upregulated in CRC, positively correlated, and associated with poorer prognosis. These findings were corroborated in a 30-pair immunohistochemistry (IHC) cohort, and target modulation was confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR and Western blotting. Gain- and loss-of-function studies showed that PFDN2 promotes, whereas its knockdown suppresses, CRC cell proliferation and migration in vitro; in vivo, PFDN2 silencing reduced xenograft growth and Ki-67/β-catenin expression. PYCR2 was likewise elevated in CRC, linked to adverse clinicopathologic features, and enhanced proliferative and migratory phenotypes. Mechanistically, co-immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence analyses revealed a PFDN2–PYCR2 interaction with predominantly cytoplasmic colocalization. PFDN2 manipulation altered PYCR2 protein but not mRNA levels; cycloheximide chase and MG132 rescue experiments indicated that PFDN2 stabilizes PYCR2 by limiting proteasome-dependent degradation. PFDN2 or PYCR2 depletion reduced TOP/FOPflash reporter activity, nuclear β-catenin accumulation, and expression of canonical Wnt targets, whereas PYCR2 re-expression partially restored these readouts and migratory capacity in PFDN2-silenced cells. Pharmacologic inhibition of canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling attenuated the pro-proliferative and pro-migratory effects of PFDN2 or PYCR2 overexpression. The PFDN2–PYCR2–Wnt/β-catenin axis appears to be involved in CRC progression, and both proteins may have potential value as prognostic biomarkers and as candidates for further investigation as therapeutic targets.
Chang et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: