Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective trial shows improved diagnostic performance of CAIX-targeted PET over standard FDG PET in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of CAIX-targeted [ 68 Ga]Ga-NY104 PET/CT versus standard [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). In this prospective single-center trial (NYCRM), 45 patients with histologically confirmed metastatic ccRCC underwent paired [ 68 Ga]Ga-NY104 and [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT scans within 7 days. Lesions were evaluated using a standardized composite reference (histopathology, imaging, and follow-up). Primary endpoints were lesion- and region-level sensitivity/specificity; secondary endpoints included SUVmax, tumor-to-background ratios (TBR), and clinical management impact. Among 682 analyzed lesions, [ 68 Ga]Ga-NY104 demonstrated superior sensitivity (94.4% vs. 78.2%, P < 0.001) and specificity (98.9% vs. 5.5%, P < 0.001) compared to [ 18 F]FDG. Region-level analysis confirmed these findings (sensitivity: 97.0% vs. 82.2%; specificity: 97.5% vs. 10.0%). [ 68 Ga]Ga-NY104 showed higher ccRCC lesion uptake (SUVmax: 12.4 ± 11.8 vs. 7.5 ± 10.7; TBR: 15.3 ± 14.6 vs. 4.7 ± 5.5, both P < 0.001) and lower non-ccRCC uptake ( P < 0.001). Notably, [ 68 Ga]Ga-NY104 identified 47 additional metastatic regions in 53% of patients and altered clinical management in 24% (11/45), including treatment intent or modality changes. This prospective head-to-head comparison between [ 68 Ga]Ga-NY104 and [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT in 45 patients with metastatic ccRCC shows superior sensitivity and specificity with [ 68 Ga]Ga-NY104 PETCT than with [ 18 F]FDG. It indicates that CAIX-targeting PET should be the PET tracer of choice over [ 18 F]FDG in restaging ccRCC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: