Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose To investigate longitudinal changes of Na[ 18 F]Fluoride uptake in the axial skeleton of patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) during biological treatment, focusing on r-axSpA and degenerative (D) lesions. Methods 20 active r-axSpA patients were included. Na[ 18 F]Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography / Computed Tomography (PET/CT) scans were performed prior to, as well as 12 and 52 weeks after starting biological therapy. PET-positive lesions in the axial skeleton were scored and classified by two blinded readers. Quantitative Na[ 18 F]Fluoride uptake was assessed by determination of standardized uptake values (SUV) corrected for individual integrated whole blood activity concentration (SUV AUC ). Results A total of 276 lesions with visual Na[ 18 F]Fluoride uptake were detected, of which 98 (36%) were defined as r-axSpA and 46 (17%) as D. The total number of r-axSpA lesions decreased from 98 at baseline to 67 at week 12 (-32%) and to 55 at week 52 (-18%), while the number of D lesions remained stable over time. The majority of r-axSpA lesions were observed in the thoracic spine (84%), while the majority of D lesions were observed in the lumbar spine (48%). Quantitatively, 84% and 88% of the r-axSpA lesions showed a decrease of Na[ 18 F]Fluoride uptake between baseline and 12 and 52 weeks, respectively. In contrast, most D lesions either showed an increase or mild decrease between baseline and follow-up. Conclusion Na[ 18 F]Fluoride uptake in visually classified r-axSpA and D lesions in r-axSpA patients on PET/CT demonstrated a striking different change in both the number of r-axSpA lesions and quantitative tracer uptake herein versus D lesions while on biological treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jongh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: