This article analyzes disparagement in trademark law, balancing consumer welfare with freedom of speech in influencer cases.
The past decade has seen a massive rise in the role of social media influencers in society. Disparagement, originally a common law remedy meant to protect trademark holders from unfair disparagement of their products or mark, is now being used as a tool to suppress free speech on the internet. By looking at several cases in the light of the culture theory of trademark and the right to freedom of speech and expression, this article argues that courts need to exercise caution while deciding upon cases pertaining to disparagement. Trademark law ought to be used while keeping its consumer protection rationale in mind, balancing disparagement with consumer welfare and the right to freedom of speech and expression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Apoorv Chaudhary (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: