Demonstrates a unified method for modeling variability in avionics, highlighting implications for automated verification.
The increasing need for configurable and reusable avionics system architectures introduces significant challenges in the systematic handling of variability across structure, behavior, and requirements. Current model-based systems engineering practices provide limited support for analyzing such variability in a consistent and verifiability-aware manner, particularly in early design phases. This paper presents a unified, SysML v2–based methodological framework for modeling, instantiating, and analyzing variability in avionics system architectures. The approach is evaluated using an avionics component case study featuring two alternative architectural design variants. A model-based trade-off analysis demonstrates that one variant enables automated verification, while the other alternative incurs significantly higher verification effort. The automatically verifiable architecture is selected based on objective, model-derived criteria. Formal verification evidence is provided to document the feasibility of the proposed solution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kausch et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: