This thesis proposes a tool that improves defect detection in requirements, indicating adaptive collaboration impacts.
Automated requirements assessment traditionally relies on universal patterns as proxies for defectiveness, implemented through rule-based heuristics or machine learning classifier strained on large annotated datasets. However, what constitutes a 'defect' is inherently context-dependent and varies across projects, domains, and stakeholder interpretations. We propose a Human-LLM Collaboration approach that treats defect prediction as an adaptive process rather than a static classification task. To probe the feasibility of this approach, we conducted an empirical investigation of different LLM-based classification strategies on an industrial requirements dataset. We derived practical design implications for tool-support and developed our first prototype: Requirely lets users flexibly configure checkers, shows explanations for its predictions, and provides automatically generated improvement suggestions to fix findings inanintegrated environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Max Unterbusch (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: