Analysis identifies capsular polysaccharide as a key driver of pathogenicity in hypervirulent strains.
Background The global dissemination of hypervirulent carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (hv-CRKP) poses escalating threats to public health. Substantial controversy persists regarding its true virulence potential, highlighting the need for reliable biomarkers to enable early diagnosis and targeted therapy. Methods Using a mouse subcutaneous challenge model, we characterized 59 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) isolates, identifying 37.29% (22/59) as convergent hv-CRKP. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization, integrated with genome-wide association study (GWAS) and transcriptomic analysis, was performed, and reliable biomarkers for accurate hv-CRKP detection were identified. Results Patients infected with hv-CRKP exhibited significantly higher sepsis incidence (P = 0.028) and increased mortality. Capsule production and hypermucoviscosity robustly discriminated hv-CRKP from CRKP. GWAS identified a significant association between an SNP in the rbtT locus and the hypervirulent phenotype, whereas virulence plasmid-associated genes showed no significant association. These findings suggest chromosomally encoded factors—independent of plasmid-borne elements—contribute critically to hypervirulence. Transcriptomics revealed rcsA-mediated capsule upregulation enhances macrophage phagocytosis resistance and bacterial survival, revealing a pivotal pathogenic mechanism. Both multivariable logistic regression and LASSO regression confirmed capsule production and rcsA expression as independent and robust diagnostic biomarkers to accurately assess virulence potential in carbapenem-resistant strains. Conclusions We conclude that clinical application of the term “hv-CRKP” requires prudent validation and emphasize the urgency of developing biomarkers to precisely identify truly hypervirulent CRKP strains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: