PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Journal of Sociolinguistics6 citationsOpen Access

Transnationalizing Raciolinguistics: An Intersectional Analysis for Understanding Chinese International Students’ Language Ideologies Across Contexts

View Full Paper
GXGengqi XiaoHWHailing WangJYJingwei Yu

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how Chinese international students navigate race and language across different contexts.
  • Conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 Chinese international students.
  • Analyzed language perceptions before and after migration.
  • Investigated the impact of socialization in China on racialized linguistic experiences abroad.
  • CISs internalized the perception that 'white' American English symbolizes success before migrating.
  • In the United States, their English was often racialized, leading to feelings of exclusion.
  • CISs faced microaggressions and accent scrutiny, prompting various coping strategies.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study adopts a transnational raciolinguistic perspective to examine how Chinese international students (CISs) navigate language, race, and identity across borders and contexts. Based on semistructured interviews with 14 CISs, the study highlights that pre‐migration socialization in China influences how CISs perceive and interpret their racialized linguistic experiences abroad. Specifically, before arriving in the United States, CISs internalized linguistic hierarchies that positioned “white” American English as a symbol of intelligence and success, reinforced by educational and societal expectations in China. However, in the United States, their English proficiency was racialized, and their Chinese national identity politicized, casting them as perpetual outsiders. They faced accent scrutiny, microaggressions, and racialized assumptions, prompting them to employ various strategies in navigating linguistic and racial hierarchies. These findings underscore that language functions as a racialized marker of belonging and exclusion, emphasizing the need for a globalized framework that captures CISs’ evolving raciolinguistic negotiations across geopolitical contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xiao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1bff267fb587c655e14ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/josl.70016
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper