PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Modeling Earth Systems and Environment2 citationsOpen Access

Spatio-temporal variation of ecosystem service values in response to land use/land cover changes: the case of Baringo County, Kenya

BRBrian RotichHKHarison Kiplagat KipkuleiAAAbdalrahman Ahmed

Key Points

  • The research aims to evaluate how land use and land cover changes affect ecosystem service values over 24 years in Baringo County.
  • Evaluated land use and land cover changes from 2000 to 2024
  • Employed the benefit transfer method to estimate ecosystem service values
  • Utilized updated valuation coefficients from the Ecosystem Services Valuation Database
  • Estimated total ecosystem service values decreased from US$ 25.70 billion in 2000 to US$ 14.92 billion in 2024
  • Represents a loss of US$ -10.78 billion, or -41.9% over the study period
  • Identified forestland reduction as the primary driver of ecosystem service value decline

Abstract

Abstract Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) changes due to human activities and natural factors significantly influence the variation in Ecosystem Service Values (ESVs). This study assessed the spatio-temporal dynamics of ESVs in Baringo, an Arid and Semi-Arid Land (ASAL) county located in Kenya’s Great Rift Valley, over 24 years (2000–2024). The Benefit Transfer Method (BTM) was employed to estimate ESV changes using LULC data for the years 2000, 2014, and 2024, alongside updated valuation coefficients from the Ecosystem Services Valuation Database (ESVD) published by de Groot and others in 2020. The analysis revealed a substantial decline in the total ESVs in Baringo County, from United States Dollars (US) 25. 70 billion in 2000 to US14. 92 billion in 2024, representing a loss of US -10. 78 billion (-41. 9%). This translates to an average annual ESV loss of approximately US -448. 96 million. Forestland reduction emerged as the primary driver of this decline, whereas expansion of water bodies contributed positively to the total ESV in the study region. These findings underscore the urgent need to combat deforestation and forest degradation while promoting the sustainable management of water resources. Such measures are essential for reversing ESV losses and achieving key Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), SDG 13 (Climate Action), and SDG 15 (Life on Land).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rotich et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1bff267fb587c655e162https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-026-02729-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The impact of land use and land cover change on ecosystem service values in the Ruvu Basin, Tanzania2026
  2. 2Evaluating the spatiotemporal dynamics of ecosystem service values in response to land use/land cover change in Goang watershed, Northwest Ethiopia2024 · 9 citations
  3. 3The impact of land use and cover change on ecosystem service value in the upper Tekeze basin2026
  4. 4Land use and land cover changes and their effect on ecosystem service values in the Bale Ecoregion, southeastern Ethiopia2024 · 9 citations
  5. 5Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Land Use and Land Cover Change and Ecosystem Service Value Assessment in Citarum Watershed, Indonesia: A Multi-Scenario and Multi-Scale Approach2026 · 2 citations