Quasi-experimental study evaluates pain reduction in laboring women, suggesting a beneficial non-drug approach.
Background: Labor pain is a subjective experience reported by more than 90% of women during childbirth. If inadequately managed, labor pain may contribute to increased maternal anxiety, prolonged labor, and potential obstetric complications. Non-pharmacological pain management strategies, such as counterpressure massage, have gained attention as safe, cost-effective, and low-risk alternatives to pharmacological interventions.Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of counterpressure massage in reducing labor pain intensity among childbearing women.Methods: A quasi-experimental study with a pretest–posttest control group design was conducted among laboring women in the working area of Kuala Bhee Primary Health Center in March 2025. A total of 28 respondents were selected and divided into an experimental group (n = 14), who received counterpressure massage for 20 minutes, and a control group (n = 14), who were provided with deep breathing techniques. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test and the Mann–Whitney U Test.Results: The findings demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in labor pain intensity in the experimental group (p = 0.001), with the mean pain score decreasing to 3.21. In contrast, the control group did not show a significant reduction in pain intensity (p = 0.084), with a mean pain score of 5.64. Furthermore, the majority of participants in the experimental group experienced a reduction in pain to the mild category (57.1%) following the intervention.Conclusion: Counterpressure massage was proven to be more effective than deep breathing techniques in reducing labor pain intensity. This method is recommended as a non-pharmacological intervention to be integrated into routine midwifery care for laboring women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seriana et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: