Experimental study assesses TiO2 and SiO2 nanolubricants' effects on traction and wear in refrigeration systems, suggesting optimal use under varying loads.
This study tests TiO2 and SiO2 nanolubricants in PAG oil using a Mini Traction Machine and an Ultra Shear Viscometer. The loads were 20 N and 40 N. The entrainment speeds ranged from 2.5 to 500 mm/s. The slide-to-roll ratio (SRR) ranged from 25 to 150%. The nanoparticle concentrations were 0.01, 0.03, and 0.05%. The ball size was 19.05 mm, and the disc was 46 mm. All tests were run at 40 °C. Only the 0.05% concentration lowered traction compared with PAG at a fixed SRR. TiO2 at 0.05% showed the largest drop, up to 4.89% at 20 N and 2.99% at 40 N. However, lower concentrations increased traction. All the nanolubricants reduced wear. TiO2 at 0.03% gave the lowest wear, with a reduction of about 35 µm at 40 N. Nanolubricant samples stayed between 40.2 and 40.5 °C, while PAG reached about 41.0 °C. TiO2 produced slightly lower temperatures than SiO2. Ultra-shear tests from 40 to 100 °C showed shear thinning. In most conditions, TiO2 at 0.05% kept the highest viscosity at 40 and 60 °C, up to 12% above PAG. SiO2 showed smaller changes. TiO2 delivered better friction, wear, temperature, and viscosity performance. Overall, both nanolubricants at 0.03% are suitable when wear reduction and thermal stability are prioritised over traction reduction, such as in refrigeration applications, while the 0.05% suits high-load or high-shear use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharif et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: