Examines how brain drain affects productivity in North Macedonia, suggesting potential policy mitigations.
This paper examines how high-skill emigration (“brain drain”) affects firm productivity in North Macedonia and whether employment policy intensity mitigates the adverse effect. The study frames brain drain as a firm-level constraint operating through skill gaps, higher turnover, and disrupted tacit knowledge transfer. Methods propose a panel-style empirical strategy linking firm performance indicators to regional brain-drain measures and policy intensity (training/reskilling and job-matching instruments). A moderated regression specification is used to estimate the migration effect and the interaction with policy intensity, while recommended robustness checks include firm fixed effects, sector controls, and instrumental-variable strategies for migration endogeneity. Using a coherent illustrative dataset to demonstrate the analytical pipeline, results show a negative association between brain-drain intensity and labor productivity and a partial offset where policy intensity is higher. The conclusions emphasize that employment policies designed around scarce skills and retention mechanisms can reduce productivity losses in skill-intensive sectors. The paper provides actionable implications for firms’ human-capital strategies and for policy makers focusing on skill formation, matching efficiency, and incentives to retain talent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fatmir M. Xheladini (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: