PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Urologia Journal0 citations

Safety and efficacy of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in pediatric patients: Insights from a single-center study

View Full Paper
NNNadeem NusratPunjab Institute of CardiologyARAssad Ur RehmanPunjab Institute of CardiologySMS MuhammadPunjab Institute of Cardiology

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the safety, efficacy, and predictors of outcomes for RIRS in pediatric patients with renal stones.
  • Retrospective observational study conducted at a single center from September 2022 to August 2024.
  • Included pediatric patients under 14 years with upper tract or renal stones up to 27 mm who underwent RIRS.
  • Data collected on demographics, stone features, surgical parameters, complications, and follow-up imaging results.
  • Statistical analysis performed using SPSS v27 and multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors.
  • 24 pediatric patients underwent RIRS with a mean age of 9.0 years, predominantly male (75%).
  • Complete stone clearance achieved in 17 patients (70.8%); access failure occurred in 4 patients (16.7%).
  • Postoperative complications noted in 5 patients (20.8%), including 4 cases of sepsis (16.7%).
  • Anatomical abnormalities showed a protective effect against complications, while larger stones negatively impacted clearance.

Abstract

Background: Pediatric urolithiasis is increasingly managed with minimally invasive approaches. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) offers a promising treatment option, though data on its outcomes in children remain limited. Objective: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and predictors of outcomes following Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) in pediatric patients with renal or upper urinary tract stones. Methods: From September 2022 to August 2024, retrospective observational research was carried out at the Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute and Research Center in Lahore. Included were pediatric patients (less than 14 years old) who had RIRS for upper tract or renal stones up to 27 mm. Demographics, stone features, surgical parameters, complications, and follow-up imaging results were among the data that were taken from electronic medical records. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v27; multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of postoperative complications and stone clearance. Results: A total of 24 pediatric patients underwent RIRS. Mean age was 9.0 ± 4.27 years; 18 (75.0%) were male. Stones were more often left-sided (14/24, 58.3%) and commonly located at multiple sites (11/24, 45.8%). RIRS was the primary treatment in 17 (70.8%) patients. Complete stone clearance was achieved in 17 (70.8%); access failure occurred in 4 (16.7%). Postoperative complications occurred in 5 (20.8%), including sepsis in 4 (16.7%). Anatomical abnormalities were seen in 5 (20.8%). Multivariate analysis showed anatomical abnormalities were protective against complications ( p = 0.037), while stone size >15 mm significantly reduced clearance odds ( p = 0.009). The predictive model for clearance was significant ( p = 0.013, R 2 = 0.519). Conclusion: RIRS is a safe and effective treatment modality for pediatric urolithiasis, achieving high stone-free rate with minimal complications. Anatomical abnormalities may reduce risk of complications, while larger stone size negatively impacts clearance. These findings support the selective use of RIRS in children with careful preoperative evaluation to optimize outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nusrat et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1c53267fb587c655eb02https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603261419000
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper