Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative analyses demonstrate enhanced methylene blue removal in modified clinoptilolite, indicating oxidation state influence.
Building on our earlier work on graphene oxide (GO)-impregnated clinoptilolite for methylene blue (MB) removal, this study directly compares GO-modified zeolite (GOZ) with an ascorbic-acid-reduced analogue (rGOZ) prepared on the same clinoptilolite matrix by liquid-phase impregnation and evaluated under identical batch conditions. Spectroscopic/microscopic, elemental (CHNS) and textural analyses (UV–Vis, FT-IR, SEM/EDS, N 2 sorptiometry and thermogravimetry) confirm successful attachment of the carbon phases (~ 9% graphene loading) and reveal distinct surface chemistries: GOZ retains abundant oxygenated groups, whereas rGOZ is more graphitic and both composites exhibit partial pore blocking. Relative to pristine clinoptilolite (q ~ 35 mg g −1 at 298 K), the maximum MB uptake (Langmuir) increases to ~ 157 mg g −1 for GOZ and ~ 123 mg g −1 for rGOZ, demonstrating a substantial enhancement upon carbon-phase incorporation. Adsorption is favored near neutral pH, follows pseudo-second-order kinetics for both composites, and shows endothermic, entropy-driven, spontaneous behavior over 298–333 K. Equilibrium data indicate more heterogeneous/pore-filling contributions for GOZ and a more monolayer-like, π–π-assisted uptake for rGOZ, consistent with their different functional-group densities. Regeneration by 0.1 N HCl washing over five cycles shows higher durability of GOZ, with MB removal decreasing from ~ 98% (cycle 1) to ~ 84% (cycle 5), compared with rGOZ decreasing from ~ 93 to ~ 71%. Overall, these results quantify how the oxidation state of the graphene phase governs MB uptake and reuse performance in clinoptilolite-based hybrid adsorbents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arias et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: